Suppose I take old data analyzed with a frequentist t-test, reanalyze it using a bayesian test, and obtain a different conclusion. Would you say this also falls under the general term replication? Or is replication strictly limited to new datasets and not new methods?
-
-
Reading this atm and they have tables with yet another list of definitions for replicate, reproduce, repeat, rerun, reuse... Trying to get everyone to agree on those would make herding cats an easy task.pic.twitter.com/sOtrdWK5FI
-
This idea of a "true" prescriptive definition (not within an article or person) is kind of pointless IMHO (because of the nature of the terms/conceptS), but comes up on Twitter every so often.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
(Taken out of context all of these terms would be confusing to some. That’s why we took care to define them precisely for our purposes. Not necessarily as a suggestion for broader use.)