4/ We find that more than 60 percent of preprints posted before 2018 have been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and that preprints with more downloads tend to show up in journals with higher impact factors:pic.twitter.com/dIVykDSmOj
• goth gremlin • computational cognitive/neuroscience modeling • geek & techish Cypriot • plant aficionada • came up with #bropenscience • http://neuroplausible.com •
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
4/ We find that more than 60 percent of preprints posted before 2018 have been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and that preprints with more downloads tend to show up in journals with higher impact factors:pic.twitter.com/dIVykDSmOj
5/ Overall, we found that more than 1,100 journals have published bioRxiv preprints so far. @SciReports has published the most, followed by @eLife and @PLOSONE. Also, most preprints that are published appear in a journal after less than 6 months, though that varies by journal toopic.twitter.com/px0B78Zz0u
6/ But enough spoilers—our preprint (my first!) is live, to my great excitement and terror. Check it out if you're interested in long-term trends in the quantity, readership and publication of biology preprints:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/01/13/515643 …
7/ And our new website may be helpful if you're looking for a way to sift through the bioRxiv avalanche. The most discussed preprints since last week, by @n8_upham @astubbsbio @choongwanwoo @biogerontology @jjtokyo @AstrobioMike @HadanyL @Tolga_Bzkrt et alhttps://www.rxivist.org/?q=&metric=twitter&category=&timeframe=week&page_size=20 …
8/8 And here are the most downloaded preprints of 2018, featuring @vagheesh @DeepMindAI @Numenta @erturklab @TCLamnidis @adamcchang @slinnarsson @ricard_sole @EvNewell1 @computingnature and others:https://www.rxivist.org/top/2018
Nice project. What do you think about the fact that "most discussed" probably doesn't correlate with good science nor even with good discussion sometimes? Also do you worry this might promote a rich get richer system, thus exacerbating non-merit-based imbalances in science?
if Rxivist is going to be the site going forward for collation, it would be great to have links to reviews and comments. Also as an author, I'd love to include an annotated bibliography for our papers, like "you might also be interested in" links which might help this problem?
Please be very VERY wary of allowing/encouraging online comments on preprints. There is reason to believe this will expose marginalized scientists to unreasonable criticism and insults.
That is a good point that I should have considered. I'm not sure how to moderate that. In an ideal world, the field would immediately dismiss reviews that are clearly mean-spirited and do nothing to advance the work (we received a pubpeer review like this).
Yeah, powerful privileged voices will rule.
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
I've summarised a little more in this thread.https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1085108047658344448?s=19 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.