I find the "conscious uncoupling" that happens every time I criticise something in the specific brand of open science my field does, neuro/psych (although mostly psych, I guess), really interesting.
Hey — I guess not everybody wants to be bubble-free and engage in dialogue. 
-
-
I think that, on the balance of evidence, the whole "Manichaeistic (e.g., “I’m for open science, you’re not”)" rhetoric — to quote
@seb_bobadilla's blog http://bradlove.org/blog/open-review-2 … — is an adaptive (no idea if purposeful, likely not) strategy that certain people develop. -
This us VS them tactic is super oldschool BTW. Nothing new to see. As I said here I think it's a classic thing they do but in their own special way.https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1084013681615269888 …
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.