you gave consent and knew what you were getting into (or should have) when you posted a public preprint and encouraged people to read it and comment on it. what more is there to it than that? why should it matter that what prompted the commentary was the review invitation?
-
-
Replying to @talyarkoni @ProfData and
Niko’s blog should have included full disclosure of his involvement in the review process, including his reviewer recommendation. Partial, selective openness is not open nor transparent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @itjohnstone @ProfData and
why? I don't believe I've ever read a published commentary by one person on another's paper that noted that the commentator had been a reviewer on the paper. is there a reason different norms should hold for blog posts? and why would that information even matter?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @talyarkoni @itjohnstone and
(FWIW, Niko's policy on open review is well-known within the community. he's not trying to hide it, and I believe he has another post somewhere that explicitly states that he only reviews publicly. this is more than you can say for most people who write commentaries.)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @talyarkoni @itjohnstone and
the unabomber manifesto was also readily available. I don't remember his victims consenting. You don't seem to have a point.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ProfData @itjohnstone and
so when people publish short commentaries about papers in Nature, does it also bother you that they don't ever begin with, "btw, I reviewed this paper"? or is that only a problem for blog posts?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @talyarkoni @ProfData and
I think your JAQing off here is amusing, but you can't really engage in a meaningful way. Like last interaction with you, in which I appreciated your ultimate big apology, you are filling threads with 100s of questions which dance around tangents and miss the big picture.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
what exactly is your big picture? from where I'm sitting, you and Brad are the ones who haven't answered any of my questions, and keep dancing around tangents.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @talyarkoni @ProfData and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
fair enough. if I have time later this week, I'll try to write an open review of your open review of Niko's open review, and maybe that will make things clearer all around.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Maybe just review the preprint? 
-
-
but I don't care about the preprint. or Niko's review. my interest here is in emerging norms of open review. so I'll write about that.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.