Just to clarify (because the above can be understood two ways): Niko always reviews publicly, so the decision to write a blog post was made upon acceptance to review (and not after the decision by the journal).
-
-
Replying to @TimKietzmann @o_guest and
Is every single review regardless of journal always publicly posted?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NeuroStats @TimKietzmann and
It's not the norm and not done at the journal we submitted. Some journals publish reviews for papers that ACCEPTED, but both authors and reviewers know this going in. In general, people give consent and know what they are getting into. Not the case here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ProfData @NeuroStats and
you gave consent and knew what you were getting into (or should have) when you posted a public preprint and encouraged people to read it and comment on it. what more is there to it than that? why should it matter that what prompted the commentary was the review invitation?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @talyarkoni @ProfData and
Niko’s blog should have included full disclosure of his involvement in the review process, including his reviewer recommendation. Partial, selective openness is not open nor transparent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @itjohnstone @ProfData and
why? I don't believe I've ever read a published commentary by one person on another's paper that noted that the commentator had been a reviewer on the paper. is there a reason different norms should hold for blog posts? and why would that information even matter?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @talyarkoni @itjohnstone and
(FWIW, Niko's policy on open review is well-known within the community. he's not trying to hide it, and I believe he has another post somewhere that explicitly states that he only reviews publicly. this is more than you can say for most people who write commentaries.)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @talyarkoni @itjohnstone and
the unabomber manifesto was also readily available. I don't remember his victims consenting. You don't seem to have a point.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ProfData @itjohnstone and
so when people publish short commentaries about papers in Nature, does it also bother you that they don't ever begin with, "btw, I reviewed this paper"? or is that only a problem for blog posts?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @talyarkoni @ProfData and
I think your JAQing off here is amusing, but you can't really engage in a meaningful way. Like last interaction with you, in which I appreciated your ultimate big apology, you are filling threads with 100s of questions which dance around tangents and miss the big picture.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Suffice it to say, I find this all really boring now. I've had some amazing DM/private interactions over this and I feel like "my job here is done".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.