Yes, it's selectively open in which the reviewer chooses what to share at a time that suits them. This is open to abuse. This is not publishing reviews after publication, as in the eLife model.
The review he sent to the journal is different (I do not know how and in what ways, but I know it is) than the one posted on his blog. So technically it's a very weird situation.
-
-
uh, isn't this exactly what you claim to want? so if it's the same review that's a problem, and if it's not the same review, that's also a problem?
-
I feel like we exist in two parallel universes where meaningful information exchange has ceased and instead you think you understand what I "claim to want" when actually I have no idea what you are on about.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.