Basically, at the end of the day, there is a system for leaving comments on preprint servers, it should be used. Because it is truly open: preserves context; allows authors to reply/engage in dialogue with criticism; and improve their manuscript.
I know what many in the specific psychology/neuroscience community think about open science. And yes, we do disagree, esp on issues of power dynamics. I'm for open science, but I've expressed on Twitter very often disagreement with their specific ideology within open science.
-
-
I have zero interest going over it again because it's always the same pattern of themes and counte-themes. My tweets on this issue, of how open science could be done to be (in my opinion) more open, are out there and Twitter has an advanced search feature if you're interested.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
