Ascribing blame to individuals is a pointless exercise really and not what I was intending on emphasising. The real blame is systemic. The field, as any human grouping, can turn against somebody for reasons outside "how good is the science".
You put words in quotes as if I said them (I haven't), assume I've a prescriptive outlook (nope), but you don't understand my perspective (you said it yourself). TBH we can't disagree when you think I'm coming from an authoritative/normative perspective... 
-
-
I know what many in the specific psychology/neuroscience community think about open science. And yes, we do disagree, esp on issues of power dynamics. I'm for open science, but I've expressed on Twitter very often disagreement with their specific ideology within open science.
-
I have zero interest going over it again because it's always the same pattern of themes and counte-themes. My tweets on this issue, of how open science could be done to be (in my opinion) more open, are out there and Twitter has an advanced search feature if you're interested.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.