the vast majority of my dept (60+ staff) use SPSS, with relatively few that use R (and of those probably only me that uses it pretty much exclusively); + SPSS is still widespread in clinical and forensic settings...
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @Matt_Craddock and
Same here. Some Stata but mostly spss
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrGBuckingham @Matt_Craddock and
That's so strange. I believe you, but I'm confused. Why haven't I met such people?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @DrGBuckingham and
Maybe it just hasn't come up in conversation? Most of my department, including myself, use SPSS
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Chris - I'm shocked!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @seriousstats @o_guest and
One of my former PIs does all her analyses in SPSS syntax, so I learned to code in it early on. Also use Matlab and Python for analyses. Tried R over a decade ago and it didn't have some features I needed and never really went back since.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I can understand using python and Matlab. I used to use SPSS for some analyses after switching to R but now it takes too long so I never bother. I can get SPSS-like ANOVA output from the afex package of I need it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @seriousstats @cMadan and
Well, I don't talk to purely empirical people. So that's partially what this is about. Where do you make your figures? Does SPSS do things like hierarchical linear models?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sure. They implement something like the the nlmr package and various other things. However, it is horrible to use and poorly documented in my experience.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
No surprises.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.