Agreed... now I have 2 concrete concerns: 1. Where will the time come from to teach coding? (Not sure that "From the time not spent learning SPSS clicking" will be sufficient.) It's easy to have ideas for adding to a curriculum, but nobody wants their stuff to have less time.
-
-
Same here. Some Stata but mostly spss
-
That's so strange. I believe you, but I'm confused. Why haven't I met such people?
-
Maybe it just hasn't come up in conversation? Most of my department, including myself, use SPSS
-
Chris - I'm shocked!
-
One of my former PIs does all her analyses in SPSS syntax, so I learned to code in it early on. Also use Matlab and Python for analyses. Tried R over a decade ago and it didn't have some features I needed and never really went back since.
-
I can understand using python and Matlab. I used to use SPSS for some analyses after switching to R but now it takes too long so I never bother. I can get SPSS-like ANOVA output from the afex package of I need it.
-
Well, I don't talk to purely empirical people. So that's partially what this is about. Where do you make your figures? Does SPSS do things like hierarchical linear models?
-
Sure. They implement something like the the nlmr package and various other things. However, it is horrible to use and poorly documented in my experience.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.