The argument seems to be, I'm paraphrasing, "psych people can't deal with complex stuff" which really boils down to "I can't teach them complex stuff". Taken at face value the argument is psych researchers are not clever — reality of course is not aligned really with that view.
-
-
Let's just say I'm not universally admired and trying to convince some "important" people to read a paper that will convince them I'm right seems like a strategy that's not destined for success. Mostly because I'm selling it.
-
Can we try just leaving copies of important papers on the floor or near printers?
-
The only way anybody "listens" to me seems to be if they repeat back what I said to me as if I never said it.

-
I'm moving onto my default strategy of getting people to do what I think they ought for reasons other than i proposed, or because I've convinced 3rd parties to advocate it for their own sake.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.