common ground to achieve positive change in the dialogue. I respect if not everyone wants to always (or at all) invest time in that, and then just respecting what the other does is fine. Absolutely.
-
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @twitemp1 and
Sorry, you are correct. I meant to add "in this context" when I said: "I think this is true for all modellers I have heard so far speaking up." But yes, in general, the fact that we might dislike certain fields means nothing to this disagreement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
There is a gulf of difference between that kind of disagreement and this one. I tried to touch on that throughout this thread but also specifically here:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1065258547699695618 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
These people are not engaging with modelling at all. When Iris disagrees about evo psych, for example, she does so via engaging.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
As I said to Ben 2 days ago, in order to disagree ideally one should understand one another's POV (to some non-trivial extent). Otherwise it is more miscommunication than disagreement.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
I am afraid Ben blocked me for this remark. I am very sorry. I did not mean it to offend.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @bradpwyble @IrisVanRooij and
Wouldn't it be funny if I was the only one here he didn't block?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vishnusreekr @bradpwyble and
Really? Or you pulling our leg?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Guess what? I'm blocked! 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.