I think that implication may not really be the intention, but the side effect of how some areas of psychology have been trying to clean up their problems. It is good that problems are addressed. Threat I see for (psych) science is the overextension of the proposed "solutions".
-
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
I ask myself why response to Shiffrin & Van Zandt was so strong. Why would e.g. social, dev, evo psychology object to views coming from mathematical psychology & cognitive science. Why not listen with interest to learn *why* these fields may have different view on things?
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Saying that people like Shiffrin and Van Zandt are the *reasons* for the problems in say, social, dev or evo psych, that preregistration aims to solve, seems to make no sense. What would people like Shiffrin and Van Zandt have to do with those problems?
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
The idea that my (esoteric, low-impact) work could be responsible for widespread disciplinary problems I find strangely satisfying.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Lol! I can imagine that
Did not know if I should tag you. Thanks for joining
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @TrishaVZ and
Oh, hey, Berna (
@zerdeve in a another side thread) and Trish have joined? Light the fires, coven! We can finally commence with the modelling witchcraft!
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Although I agree with most of the points made, referring to the degree of poor consideration we have for other fields is a little an ad hominem tu quoque argument which not only deviates the attention from more pressing matters but may result in deepening the disagreement.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Déjà vu. We can do better, I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @IrisVanRooij and
I don't tell them what to do with their subfield.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Fair, but we don't need to attack it, not in this context at least. Inadequacy of pre-registration, autocratic approach, intimidation and coercive ways, control of the field... these are more urgent matters imo
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"Attack" is again very polemic-sounding.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
You know what I mean, (criticize or oppose fiercely and publicly) which I find counterproductive. Anyway, I give up, I know where this goes, have seen it before.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.