Well that’s a constructive contribution, isn’t it? That study was a challenge to an influential theory in the field and was led by a masters student. Hope you are proud of yourself.
-
-
Replying to @Ben_C_J @vishnusreekr and
It was not constructive indeed but I guess it reflects very well the frustration generated among the community. It also shows that judging other people's work from a position of ignorance is not advisable. We all should understand the latter.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Well said
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @bradpwyble @twitemp1 and
The thing is I'm not sure what they are doing is just/exactly judging. It's more just assuming our subfield works like theirs in terms of literally how to do science.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
From there, they then take an additional police style approach. Resulting in telling people who do science a very different way to essentially stop.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
It's really baffling. Nothing like "I don't like modelling". More like "I'm going to halt all these forms of modelling and not listen to you because my subfield has a problem..."
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
I think that implication may not really be the intention, but the side effect of how some areas of psychology have been trying to clean up their problems. It is good that problems are addressed. Threat I see for (psych) science is the overextension of the proposed "solutions".
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
I ask myself why response to Shiffrin & Van Zandt was so strong. Why would e.g. social, dev, evo psychology object to views coming from mathematical psychology & cognitive science. Why not listen with interest to learn *why* these fields may have different view on things?
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Saying that people like Shiffrin and Van Zandt are the *reasons* for the problems in say, social, dev or evo psych, that preregistration aims to solve, seems to make no sense. What would people like Shiffrin and Van Zandt have to do with those problems?
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
The idea that my (esoteric, low-impact) work could be responsible for widespread disciplinary problems I find strangely satisfying.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
"Modellers did it"
-
-
-
Replying to @TrishaVZ @IrisVanRooij and
I really do feel like saying "Rich Shiffrin did it" isn't that far off what has been said by certain people. And to be honest given the context, the fact it's 2018 and on and on, I feel like it's just as scary as it is ridiculous.
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.