I think it's fair to say that when someone says e.g. "Pre-reg doesn't prevent exploration" they are essentially supporting universal pre-reg (otherwise why say it?). And yet there is no specific tweet one can point to.
-
-
Replying to @bradpwyble @o_guest and
It’s a bit amusing to me that people who study “are good looking women less susceptible to illnesses?” take it upon themselves to dictate how the field must do science.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vishnusreekr @o_guest and
I understand the point you're making but I don't think it's helpful to be disparaging here as it encourages people to dig even deeper trenches.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @bradpwyble @o_guest and
All it means is that they don’t quite appreciate how other sub fields work.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vishnusreekr @bradpwyble and
Well that’s a constructive contribution, isn’t it? That study was a challenge to an influential theory in the field and was led by a masters student. Hope you are proud of yourself.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ben_C_J @vishnusreekr and
It was not constructive indeed but I guess it reflects very well the frustration generated among the community. It also shows that judging other people's work from a position of ignorance is not advisable. We all should understand the latter.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Well said
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @bradpwyble @twitemp1 and
The thing is I'm not sure what they are doing is just/exactly judging. It's more just assuming our subfield works like theirs in terms of literally how to do science.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
Yes this is exactly what I was referring to when I said this was not merely about not understanding the other subfield but was rather reflective of a more fundamental difference in how we approach problems.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vishnusreekr @o_guest and
Agreed but the problem arises in my opinion when these fundamental differences in our understanding on how science works are ignored and value judgements are made.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The irony is I think they value our field because they perceive it as prestigious. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.