Nobody can say how those two tweets should be interpreted. You're saying they are not how I read them. Tell us how you read them. 
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
That all work should be published (it says that explicitly) but that if there is a place for journals and pre-pub peer review it is providing the administrative infrastructure for RRs (which aren’t only for confirmatory testing).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Many people have clarified these points to you now, including several on the thread you linked to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You are pretty clearly being disingenuous with your bad-faith take that this is some sort push to impose confirmatory testing on everyone, since you’ve kept going with that interpretation even when people have explicitly said it isn’t and have explained what it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I can see how you might have equated ‘journal’ with ‘publish’ and ‘RR’ with ‘confirmatory’ without pausing for thought, but persisting with that reading of it when people have clarified those misunderstandings isn’t helpful.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Ben_C_J @bradpwyble and
I think our misunderstandings are way deeper. Those are not the differences in our readings from my perspective. Firstly, I thought you all loved Popper? So falsificationism is more your thing, right? Secondly, are you saying publish is being inclusive of preprints? Can't tell.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted
I find it very amusing you think I'm arguing in bad faith but can't ascribe a motive. Bad faith REQUIRES a motive. What is my motive? https://twitter.com/Ben_C_J/status/1065175996549267456 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
From the first tweet in the thread you highlighted: “Journals are now exclusively for registered reports, everything else is published as preprint” That couldn’t be clearer that published includes preprint (it literally says ‘published as preprint’).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ben_C_J @bradpwyble and
The part that is extreme is the part you haven't explained: "Journals are now exclusively for registered reports" — why should my work only be available as a preprint?
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
That would be covered by this bit ‘if there is a place for journals.........which aren’t only for confirmatory testing)’ earlier in this thread and the discussion in the original thread that this model would require preprints to have equal status to work published in journals.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Separate but equal, got you. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.