Thanks for your thoughtful thread. As someone committed to transparent science and computational modelling, this issue is close to my lab's heart. I think the issues you raise are valid. Perhaps one take-away is that one size fits all PR isn't helpful here.
-
-
Well, this was the tweet you took as a suggestion that only preregistered work should be published. It pretty clearly doesn’t say that, which is why I was curious what the other examples you’d seen said.https://twitter.com/robustgar/status/1043453476397834241?s=21 …
-
Parse it for us.
-
It's part of a series of things people have said with very extreme views. Otherwise why do you think
@bradpwyble and@micahgallen think what we think? -
I think you're under the impression that if we don't dedicate hours trawling through tweets to defend our opinion on this that we are by definition wrong. But I actually have a day job as do others and twitter is nasty to search. If you haven't felt the vibe, well, that's fine.
-
Also I think you think if you follow me around every time I comment on this that you will exhaust me and I'll stop saying that the rhetoric recently flipped. Sealioning me over this is hilarious.
-
IMHO that tweet (and thread) you linked me linked to is a great example.
-
Nobody can say how those two tweets should be interpreted. You're saying they are not how I read them. Tell us how you read them.

- 38 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
