I think some don’t follow how often we get “ofc you must prereg” or “prereg is for all exploratory research” comments, whenever we talk abt modeling work that doesn’t fit their mold. Insisting that it’s us who misunderstand the intentions of prereg folks is kinda gaslighting.
-
-
Berna D. Retweeted
There are prob misunderstandings and overgeneralizations on all sides. I’m glad at least some understanding has been reached among some folks even though the bad faith arguments still exist. e.g., what Danielle discusses here: https://twitter.com/djnavarro/status/1064481703974957057?s=21 …
Berna D. added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Melissa Kline Retweeted Melissa Kline
Reposting an invitation to people in this (sprawling) conversation!https://twitter.com/melissaekline/status/1064555044966678529 …
Melissa Kline added,
Melissa Kline @melissaeklineReplying to @IrisVanRooij @hansijzerman and 3 others(Sorry for anyone who sees this 2x, attempting to hit the meta-thread tangle) Hi, I'd like to personally invite everyone in this thread to consider attending SIPS in Rotterdam in July! It would be really valuable to have sessions on communication failure, scope-limitations, etc.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @richarddmorey @melissaekline and
Ah the irony I see two replies to
@melissaekline's tweet above and yet can only view one. Even in this thread somebody seems to be replying who has me blocked, I guess?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey and
I can only see tweets from you, Richard,
@zerdeve & Iris, so IDK.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melissaekline @richarddmorey and
Well, the "2" following the speech bubble means your tweet has two replies. I only see
@richarddmorey's reply.pic.twitter.com/4mEa5WV6rq
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @melissaekline and
Iris van Rooij Retweeted Iris van Rooij
I noticed the same on my tweet here (3 responses but I only see 2): https://twitter.com/irisvanrooij/status/1064558169018564609?s=21 … but as Berna says, it could mean someone deleted an earlier reply.
Iris van Rooij added,
Iris van Rooij @IrisVanRooijReplying to @melissaekline @hansijzerman and 3 othersMuch appreciate your (repeated) invitation Melissa. I won’t be able to attend. I know others, who also have valuable perspectives seemingly underrepresented at SIPS, cannot either. Other ideas than attending SIPS to facilitate better communication, mutual understanding & respect?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @melissaekline and
I don't think that is how Twitter deals with deleted tweets. Deleted tweets do not leave a "ghost" reply number.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
They always do when I delete my reply tweets with typos and post corrected ones. That’s why I suggested that might be the reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Ah, I had no idea. Interesting!
Maybe I'm too tolerant of my typos. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.