I want to understand her philosophy though – when a tenured prof keeps vaguely but forcefully calling out alleged bullying and tone issues, but thinks tone doesn’t apply to them, I think the line between tone issues and disagreement needs to be clearer.
-
-
Replying to @zerdeve
Mh but you’ve just openly criticised that tweet by James. Who’s an ECR, while you’re fully tenured. Sure, it was only a joke and not his research, but I don’t see this distinction made when it goes the other way. Joking “I want to burn things to the ground” is still bad, yeah?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zerdeve
Thanks, but I didn’t get the feeling you were engaging in any conversation. Would love to actually talk about this sometime, on the mutual assumption of good faith, as I find this very perplexing and I think there might be some deeper misunderstanding.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zerdeve
And *I’m* the one who’s aggressive? Do you not see any room for us both misunderstanding each other?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
ECR versus tenure isn't the only axis of privilege at play here. So since you brought it up, you are clearly thinking about such axes, which is great. Intersectional ways of thinking about this tend to be most fruitful, I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
No need to be patronising, I've been engaging with feminism and identifying as a feminist for basically as long as I can remember; I can totally see gender trumping position when it's e.g. tenured prof vs associate prof, but not when it's tenured prof vs postdoc/PhD/lower.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Thanks for the insight into your perspective.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.