Idea. Why don’t we as academics created a site like Glassdoor with ratings on open science, diversity/inclusiveness, work-life balance, salary, and other important features of academy, and then actually relate them to important outcomes?
-
-
True. But I think the current system is much more open to abuse of juniors. I think that monitoring some kind of outcome related to ratings would be crucial, and/or perhaps some kind of way to validate account without identifying person.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And would replicate current power structures.
-
Would you suggest a different way to tear down those structures?
-
It depends what you are trying to do. The idea itself is probably good — it is the crowd aspect that is open to abuse.
-
Also I don't trust people to know how to measure inclusivity for example.
-
though that is something to be developed - reliable measure.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
