Agree and ALSO, open notebook science is the only complete, or closest to nearly complete, solution to the file-drawer problem. This is not talked about as much as it should be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-notebook_science …
-
-
I use github plus psychopy to do it, making everything public as i go along.
@JeffRouder and others do that too but we need a tool to reconstruct a linear timeline0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djnavarro @ceptional and
I do this already. Not for manuscripts though, code only. My LaTeX is on a git repo (
@overleaf) but I do not make that public.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @djnavarro and
The obvious problems are how do you detect force'ing and filter-branch'ing etc though? That is totally doable and changes history, right?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djnavarro @o_guest and
We use Rmarkdown + git for everything. We keep a public and a private branch for papers, with the public branch set to github and the private branch to my lab server. All data are public every night on a git commit / git push script. We do it because it makes our life simple.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JeffRouder @djnavarro and
as described in broader context in
@JeffRouder &@JuliaHaaf 's in-press(?) AMPPS paper http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/amp , and in a preprint on@PsyArXiv1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I see. So it wouldn't work for modelling/writing methods libraries to just automatically push without reason. But I guess it works for analysis scripts and stuff? What do you do for binary files which aren't diff/git-able?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.