Sorry about what happened to you. But may be they have better marketing? Furthermore, what’s the license on your code? Looks like you need to contact some IP lawyers... the problem is that in AI field, everybody is leveraging some github code. Now who owns the output?
-
-
Replying to @aichip1
of course they have better marketing - they aren't artists, they're marketers. I put it out open source with no license so there's no legal stuff I can claim. I really just wanted to provide the AI + art community with some fun tools - never thought anyone would do this.
11 replies 4 retweets 108 likes -
Wait, so what's your issue? You open sourced an implementation of someone else's algorithm. Someone else used your open source code to generate a painting and someone else wants to buy that painting. I'm not sure I see what the outrage is about?
8 replies 3 retweets 122 likes -
so he put it online for free so he would get the benefit of being a nice open source contributor. but now that someone else is getting money he also wants the economic benefit.
1 reply 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @manugarri @alykhantejani and
No licence explicitly included doesn't mean no copyright. Copyright is automatically conferred.
3 replies 1 retweet 21 likes -
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @alykhantejani and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 1 retweet 21 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alykhantejani and
Also don't forget he can also remove it from BSD for the future if he wants. It's his code and he can relicense it going forwards.https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/242760/can-i-as-author-and-copyright-holder-relicense-my-code-under-a-more-liberal-li …
2 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alykhantejani and
Cool! I was just wondering about this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
IANAL of course! The general gist is it's your code and a license is not how YOU use it but how others do. That being said you cannot revoke the license. So those who used your code in accordance with the license at time 0 even if you changed it at time 1 are fine/unaffected.
-
-
But those coming in at time 1 to use your code have to play by the new license. Often these things are settled out of court since asking people to play by the rules/laws tends to be enough it seems.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There are related issues like this too of course:https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/2632/does-physically-removing-gpl-code-relieve-combined-work-from-gpl-publication-req …
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.