Part of my reticence to embrace OS is I don’t want to be allied with the awful OS bros.
-
-
So I think Sam is equating the two here as people keep doing that – see the outrage at that (bad) chronicle article, or one of the replies to the original tweet of this thread. If people don’t see them as the same(ish), they should just join SIPS as a movement and leave OS be
-
I like openscience it's a beautiful movement. This is why I want it to be healthy.
-
BTW these things always happen. When I wrote this (a pro open science/open source) post, I got push back saying I'm against people coding... Even though I wrote it to help people learn how to code.http://neuroplausible.com/matlab
-
People will always find a way to twist stuff one way or another. But in my ten years of doing research (much less than many in this thread) open science has been great to see gain momentum, totally a great thing.
-
But it naturally will attract bad actors. And we need to weed them out. That's all. I'm 100% for Open science. I didn't spend my phd (4+ years ago now time flies!) replicating computational models, begging for open source, and better research practises to give up now.

-
Yes, but let’s weed them out individually and directly! That’s harder to do, but looks much more encouraging and welcoming than talking down the whole movement.
-
Let's just disagree to disagree.

-
But I think we agree! I just don’t think it’s helpful to say that there is a general problem, because then we keep bad actors - which is what we all want to avoid!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
