Sure, not all men or all OS advocates are the kinds of "bros" @aidenhorner was complaining about. But the #9ReplyGuy action that @ProfJessTracy was getting was condescending and rude, and used OS as its "cover." I think it's pretty important to call that kind of behavior out.
-
-
Replying to @LindaSkitka @ldscherer and
I am a little curious if
@lakens has responded to men who've posted their papers on twitter by suggesting they p-curve their body of work to make sure there's no pattern that could lead to the removal of grants/awards. If so, then gender bias probably not relevant here.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ProfJessTracy @LindaSkitka and
Daniël Lakens Retweeted Daniël Lakens
Some are men, https://twitter.com/lakens/status/888626450089246720 … https://twitter.com/lakens/status/598905862695034880 … https://twitter.com/lakens/status/1004119102485614592 … https://twitter.com/lakens/status/986151151543386112 … Some are women: https://twitter.com/lakens/status/974329483317653506 … As you see (and as was in my JPSP blog post) I see more of these patterns than I should and care to be seeing.
Daniël Lakens added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @lakens @ProfJessTracy and
Also - these are clearly not my kindest tweets. I fully admit that. This is sort of a trigger for me. I ask and complain about it (there was a very nice paper in 2011 telling us to stop - I think people should have read it by now).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lakens @ProfJessTracy and
Based on anecdotal experience from my own life: I criticize things on a regular basis. Whenever I criticize gender studies, or sometimes when I criticize women, my own gender is brought up. But I am pretty sure if you'd analyze all my tweets, I don't discriminate.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lakens @LindaSkitka and
Very good to hear! Thanks for clarifying.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfJessTracy @lakens and
Personally, I think dynamic can still be gendered, even if men in the conversation treat men & women in same unpleasant way. Because typically the woman in the conversation cannot be similarly harsh & direct in their responses without bearing disproportional social consequences.
3 replies 4 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @ProfJessTracy and
Still makes the dynamic unequal IMO. Not saying we‘d want to enable harsh communication by women. Rather, in an inclusive open science community where constructive criticism is possible kindness is a catalyzer IMO not an obstacle or silencer, as some bros seem to want to view it.
1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @ProfJessTracy and
Yup. Exactly why
#bropenscience IMHO is useful.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Daniël Lakens Retweeted Sophia Crüwell
Daniël Lakens added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Co-opting "tone policing" was a bro-y thing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Be sure to scroll up in that thread.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lakens @IrisVanRooij and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ @o_guestEvery time I (and others) say there's s certain bro elements within certain#openscience circles (which I like to collectively call#bropenscience because they don't care about the inclusivity/diversity aspect of it) somebody will insunuate I am/we are against open science.
Show this thread0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.