Thanks Laura!
-
-
Agree there are lots of good bros (in the true brotherly sense) out there. But when you're a woman who tweets about your work and several dudes respond with insinuations about your whole career, it's tough to not feel like there's a gender dynamic at play (even if there's not).
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likes -
I totally get that. And for me, that's one of the most difficult things about gender bias. It's a whole other level of thinking that guys don't have to process, i.e. "is it my gender, or is it me, or are they just being assholes and it's not me or my gender?"
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ldscherer @ProfJessTracy and
I personally don't perceive tons of gender bias in OS, but I do see the harsh criticism coming primarily from men so I can understand how that perception developed. 2 things I'd like to see: Post-pub critiques that are more thoughtful and constructive, + more female voices heard
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @ldscherer @ProfJessTracy and
Sure, not all men or all OS advocates are the kinds of "bros"
@aidenhorner was complaining about. But the#9ReplyGuy action that@ProfJessTracy was getting was condescending and rude, and used OS as its "cover." I think it's pretty important to call that kind of behavior out.2 replies 3 retweets 29 likes -
-
Replying to @ldscherer @LindaSkitka and
...and I just want to make sure that you guys know that I'm not intending to defend that guy or any other guy/girl who is condescending and rude. What I'm intending to defend is the idea of OS, and to make sure that it is inclusive of positive voices like mine (I hope) and yours
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ldscherer @ProfJessTracy and
Thanks-- it wasn't 100% clear given the context of the conversation. We're good!



1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @LindaSkitka @ldscherer and
That's exactly why I created
#bropenscience — like mentioned broism is prominent in the retoric/Tweets in certain spaces of open science. Hopefully we're not down the road of open scource (a sibling movement/community)!https://www.wired.com/2017/06/diversity-open-source-even-worse-tech-overall/ …1 reply 5 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @LindaSkitka and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
More on how diversity and inclusivity can be/are part of
#openscience see this too.https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/889248986984591362?s=19 …Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes
To avoid context collapse, I'm an open science and open source supporter, which is why I care about the movement/community.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @LindaSkitka and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Iris van Rooij
Also this, great tweet:https://twitter.com/IrisVanRooij/status/1043987107088347142 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Iris van Rooij @IrisVanRooijIf you think that the term#bropenscience means all open scientists are bros, you are missing 2 points: 1) those who use the term are pro open science, 2) they know that not all of open science is bropen science; clearly, otherwise there would be no need for a special signifier.0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
