-
-
-
Replying to @mcxfrank
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
No worries! Another useful one is:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/895199957099192320 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
And here's something to make us realise why inclusivity and diversity are actually priorities we should have... if we don't attend to these aspects of "open" within our movement/community, we might end up like the open source community.https://www.wired.com/2017/06/diversity-open-source-even-worse-tech-overall/ …
1 reply 7 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
This is super interesting. I believe very deeply in diversity and inclusion and have been working for these goals 1) through
@cogsci_soc, 2) through departmental committee, 3) through my REU program at Stanford, but have tended to differentiate this goal from open science. /!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
in part because I think it's useful to think about the philosophical core of open science as being verifiability/transparency (as in the thread). /2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it seems to be remiss to define open access via verifiability and transparency, explicitly leaving out accessibility despite it being part of its namesake
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
I'm very happy to have accessibility be part of the story. In this case, I see it as a value that's derived from transparency personally but we can disagree about the origin given that we both value it!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You mean the origin of open in the open science movement? Surely that's well-documented?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, I mean in the philosophical structure of my beliefs. It's transparent turtles all the way down. :)pic.twitter.com/4pTG0CXz4W
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
