Some ways I gently push back: 1) appeals to the shared project, rather than the individual (we're in this together). 2) appeals to the values (nullius in verba again!). 3) argument from the counterfactual: would it be better not to know we're wrong? /11http://sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/2016/02/end-of-the-world.html …
-
Show this thread
-
There is a lot of change happening, and change can be disorienting. But I'm very optimistic about psychology and science more broadly, and very glad that I'm working at this time and not another. /end
4 replies 5 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @mcxfrank
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
2 replies 4 retweets 12 likes -
-
Replying to @mcxfrank
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
No worries! Another useful one is:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/895199957099192320 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
And here's something to make us realise why inclusivity and diversity are actually priorities we should have... if we don't attend to these aspects of "open" within our movement/community, we might end up like the open source community.https://www.wired.com/2017/06/diversity-open-source-even-worse-tech-overall/ …
1 reply 7 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
This is super interesting. I believe very deeply in diversity and inclusion and have been working for these goals 1) through
@cogsci_soc, 2) through departmental committee, 3) through my REU program at Stanford, but have tended to differentiate this goal from open science. /!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
in part because I think it's useful to think about the philosophical core of open science as being verifiability/transparency (as in the thread). /2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it seems to be remiss to define open access via verifiability and transparency, explicitly leaving out accessibility despite it being part of its namesake
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
I'm very happy to have accessibility be part of the story. In this case, I see it as a value that's derived from transparency personally but we can disagree about the origin given that we both value it!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You mean the origin of open in the open science movement? Surely that's well-documented?
-
-
No, I mean in the philosophical structure of my beliefs. It's transparent turtles all the way down. :)pic.twitter.com/4pTG0CXz4W
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
