http://osf.io and http://aspredicted.org also allow preregistration, providing verifiability of analytic hypotheses. Prereg is not about discouraging exploration! It's about being transparent about *what you knew* before data collection. /5 http://babieslearninglanguage.blogspot.com/2016/07/preregister-everything.html …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And here's something to make us realise why inclusivity and diversity are actually priorities we should have... if we don't attend to these aspects of "open" within our movement/community, we might end up like the open source community.https://www.wired.com/2017/06/diversity-open-source-even-worse-tech-overall/ …
-
This is super interesting. I believe very deeply in diversity and inclusion and have been working for these goals 1) through
@cogsci_soc, 2) through departmental committee, 3) through my REU program at Stanford, but have tended to differentiate this goal from open science. /! -
in part because I think it's useful to think about the philosophical core of open science as being verifiability/transparency (as in the thread). /2
-
Who will you make it open for if not everybody is welcome? There's a reason under that umbrella above it includes equity, inclusivity, diversity. The spectacular failure of open source at being open to women in tech, for example, is a good lesson IMHO.
-
As I said to
@melissaekline: I think diversity and inclusion are critical prior values that are not yoked to the umbrella of scientific verification. We should value D/I *and* open science, not D/I *because* open science. D/I is important even when we're not doing science at all. -
This is really just a semantic disagreement I think (or hope). Our values are aligned, I just try to pursue D/I initiatives in open science because I think they're important everywhere, not in OS specifically.
-
I think it's important in many spaces too, but I see specific issues with(in) open science and I know the "open" in open science was put there for various reasons not just to mean one meaning of "open".

-
Well we should certainly address D/I issues even more in communities where there are problems around representation, so in that sense I definitely agree!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
