I would also add that anyone interested in non-intentional accounts of computation should read Gualtiero Piccinini's 'Physical Computation' which is probably the best book on philosophy of computation out there
-
-
Yes- internationally. I did cog psy in early 90 and had to learn c ++ Lisp and fid neural nets, some non linesr dynamics and math and logic in addition. Hard to find common ground for teaching theoretical aspects.
-
I always thought psy needed more formal things (I purdued it voluntarily) but it hasn’t happened. Very smart students, but formsl aspects still not huge part.
-
For a brief moment, I thought you had verbed Purdue University. :-)
-
Crap - I really do know how to spell, usually. Just not on the damned i-phone
-
I know, and it it's any consolation, it's very clever not to use autocorrect. It would have been something like: "I airways thought rye heeded gore forlorn thongs (I pursued it volatile) but it hasn’t gardened. Very art students, but forms aspects stall not huge party."
-
I always feel the cost benefit trade off between semantos and typos is complex.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.