i read the article when it blew up. so many people were rightly disappointed and it doesn't align with @improvingpsych's code of conduct for sure
@katiecorker hopefully SIPS can address this if it hasn't already?
-
-
Replying to @djnavarro @lysanderjames and
I wrote this back then, but decided not to post. Here is my response:
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @katiecorker @djnavarro and
Speaking only for myself, it's important to remember that SIPS is not one thing or one person. Lee writes about synergy between SIPS' mission and heterodox's mission. Other SIPS' members likely strongly disagree. [1/2]
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @katiecorker @djnavarro and
That's fine. We can debate the ideas but not attribute a perspective to all SIPS' members. [2/2]
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @katiecorker @djnavarro and
thanks for this, katie! still not sure why SIPS isn't taking a firmer stand on the issue when the org is being used to further right-wing views and the idea of "ideological diversity" comes in conflict with your code of conduct (ensuring a safe environment for minorities, etc.)
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @lysanderjames @katiecorker and
In what way does Ideological diversity create an unsafe environment for minorities?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Richie_Research @lysanderjames and
ideological diversity sounds nice in theory but if your ideology is that women are genetically inferior as scientist, for example, I can see how women would feel unsafe (unsafe isn't the right word, and women aren't a minority, but you get the point)
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
Women are a minority within STEM.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.