Hey @improvingpsych , do we have a membership gender breakdown? CR article could only find @siminevazire , other than that the reformers are apparently all dudes *eyeroll*https://twitter.com/ChronicleReview/status/1039624940583051265 …
-
-
Agreed. I can only imagine how confusing/misleading it can be when reading this with little background knowledge. I really don't want people to get a wrong impression of
@improvingpsych. -
How did this happen? Did this journalist only go to some of the worst events?
-
Take the second screenshot as an example. Literally *everyone* explained why they came to SIPS. Generally these were positive/constructive motivations, sometimes also with regret or frustration. In the context of the article this doesn't become clear.
-
So it's cherry-picked? Just the bad eggs, etc.?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.