Exactly, with centralized systems cost if having one size fits all and procedures the average person has no chance of interacting with. Decentralized systems:lengths can be shorter & can represent a richer class of solutions with most of the constraints being adhering to protocol
-
-
Sorry, for me they are synonims. I don't quite follow
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
morality tends to be religious and conservative in nature, for example
-
Ok, point taken, please change the word to ethics
-
if you change the word to ethics then you consent/concede to a rule-based system (even if rules has spirits like common law), which I do too BTW
-
I disagree. Rules are enforced externally. The enforcer of ethics, of internal rules, is the proper individual, despite their social origin.
-
don't ethics and an external set of rules to enforce them, usually go together?
-
Not quite in my view. Social rules, when incorporated to a personal set of ethics, do not require external enforcers. Setting social rules however does imply external enforcers though.
-
*nods* there's always a mechanism for getting feedback
-
Oh yes, I will call it reinforcement and punishment ;)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
