Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
o_guest's profile
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
@o_guest

Tweets

Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ

@o_guest

• goth gremlin • computational cognitive/neuroscience modeling • geek & techish Cypriot • plant aficionada • came up with #bropenscience • http://neuroplausible.com  •

Τότεναμ, Λονδίνο & Cyprus
olivia.science
Joined October 2015

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Katja Thieme  👀‏ @Katja_Thieme 1 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet

      "There is nothing that distinguishes #ROGD from the diagnostic criteria that already exists for gender dysphoria in children except parents’ *perception* that it has come about quite suddenly." 2/

      1 reply 8 retweets 36 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Katja Thieme  👀‏ @Katja_Thieme 1 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet

      "Not coincidentally, it is only parents who wish to disabuse their children of the possibility that they are transgender who have observed #ROGD and insist upon its validity." 3/

      1 reply 4 retweets 33 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Katja Thieme  👀‏ @Katja_Thieme 1 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet

      "One might think that a researcher looking to understand or substantiate #ROGD would actually find ways to work directly with the children who supposedly experienced it to document their experiences." 4/

      2 replies 6 retweets 30 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Katja Thieme  👀‏ @Katja_Thieme 1 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet

      "But Littman did none of that. All she did was anonymously survey parents from the exact same anti-trans online parent groups that invented the concept, codifying their totally bogus myth in the guise of a scientific study." 5/

      1 reply 9 retweets 36 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Katja Thieme  👀‏ @Katja_Thieme 1 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet

      "As Julia Serano points out in her detailed debunk of Littman’s study, all available guidelines for treating trans children already account for the possibility that teens might present with gender dysphoria despite having no prior history of gender-nonconforming behavior." 6/

      1 reply 4 retweets 27 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Katja Thieme  👀‏ @Katja_Thieme 1 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet

      "It’s not social contagion, as the #ROGD parents claim, but social acceptance for trans people that easily explains the growth. The same exact thing happened with left-handedness. There used to be intense stigma against being left-handed." 7/

      4 replies 7 retweets 34 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Katja Thieme  👀‏ @Katja_Thieme 1 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet

      "All Littman did was prove that anti-trans parents believe that their own anti-trans views are legitimate. Unfortunately for the scientific merit of her paper, she also believed them. Her study presents the results as somehow validating the legitimacy of #ROGD." 8/

      1 reply 4 retweets 32 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Katja Thieme  👀‏ @Katja_Thieme 1 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet

      "Notably, PLOS One does not have a standard peer-review process. Rather than requiring articles to be assessed by a group of other experts in the field, a single PLOS One editor assesses only the technical aspects of the study, ignoring subjective or interpretative aspects." 9/

      2 replies 3 retweets 27 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Gary Lupyan‏ @glupyan 2 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Katja_Thieme @o_guest

      That’s not true at all. PLoS ONE had a standard peer review process albeit one in which reviewers are asked to not evaluate novelty (source: published in and reviewed for it)

      2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    10. Rineke Verbrugge‏ @RinekeV 3 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @glupyan @Katja_Thieme @o_guest

      I agree with Gary Lupyan here. I've also received three peer reviews for the papers I submitted there; and written reviews for other PLoS one submissions that also received three reviews per article + editorial letter.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest 3 Sep 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @RinekeV @glupyan @Katja_Thieme

      Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ

      https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1036560820942118912 …

      Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,

      Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ @o_guest
      Replying to @RinekeV @Katja_Thieme @glupyan
      See this side-thread, as IMHO otherwise it's going to become too split to have a coherent discussion. Twitter drives me mad when people accidentally/purposefully reply in a non-linear way — hope this helps us! https://twitter.com/twitemp1/status/1036560103200178177 …
      3:25 AM - 3 Sep 2018
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Rineke Verbrugge‏ @RinekeV 3 Sep 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @o_guest @glupyan @Katja_Thieme

          Actually, I think the fact that the particular paper has probably been reviewed by reviewers + PLoS editor makes the fact that it has been published even worse than if it were the mistake of 1 editor. I agree that the article is fatally flawed & would be in favor of retraction.

          1 reply 3 retweets 9 likes
        3. This Tweet is unavailable
        4. Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest 3 Sep 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @LaurelaiBailey1 @RinekeV and

          I have no idea what PLOS One will do. It's a strange situation. Have we an update?

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        5. Rineke Verbrugge‏ @RinekeV 4 Sep 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @o_guest @LaurelaiBailey1 and

          PLoS ONE staff has added a comment that they are having experts look at the methodological concerns: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comment?id=10.1371/annotation/2a4269d4-90ab-4f26-bf00-1348cc787ca8 … It seems that this may take a while.

          1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes
        6. Rineke Verbrugge‏ @RinekeV 4 Sep 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @RinekeV @o_guest and

          Here's a bit more of the current backstory at PLoS ONE; it may also be a good place to look for updates:https://retractionwatch.com/2018/08/29/reader-outcry-prompts-brown-to-retract-press-release-on-trans-teens/ …

          0 replies 2 retweets 1 like
        7. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info