"There is nothing that distinguishes #ROGD from the diagnostic criteria that already exists for gender dysphoria in children except parents’ *perception* that it has come about quite suddenly." 2/
-
-
Actually, I think the fact that the particular paper has probably been reviewed by reviewers + PLoS editor makes the fact that it has been published even worse than if it were the mistake of 1 editor. I agree that the article is fatally flawed & would be in favor of retraction.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I have no idea what PLOS One will do. It's a strange situation. Have we an update?
-
PLoS ONE staff has added a comment that they are having experts look at the methodological concerns: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comment?id=10.1371/annotation/2a4269d4-90ab-4f26-bf00-1348cc787ca8 … It seems that this may take a while.
-
Here's a bit more of the current backstory at PLoS ONE; it may also be a good place to look for updates:https://retractionwatch.com/2018/08/29/reader-outcry-prompts-brown-to-retract-press-release-on-trans-teens/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.