apparently that’s how science is supposed to work nowadays. or so they tell me.
-
-
Ugh! So __some__ fields just do conference proceedings and preprints... sadly I'm in a field which rejects my paper so many times (~10) I have given up
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think that’s the way to go tbh. I have zero confidence in the review process and zero reason to believe peer review advances science.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't feel this way exactly — but I am very disappointed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Gaetan Burgio
It's certainly not a merit-based system. Not that you needed this linked-to evidence to believe it, as daily life gives us tons too, but nice to see it vindicated:https://twitter.com/GaetanBurgio/status/1034755964317007872 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Gaetan Burgio @GaetanBurgioThis paper demonstrates prizes are concentrated within a small group of scientific elites with strong ties to a point we can strongly predict who wins prizes from co-authorship networks => small number of ideas and scholars lead science https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09412 pic.twitter.com/E0rc6zJC6Q1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This is cool! And of course frustrating.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm going to blog about this (what you described in the OP — but ofc my case) BTW.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Oh awesome topic for blog. Looking forward to it!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
To be fair, your case sounds very very nasty. In some ways worse than rejection perhaps? Unprofessional.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It is unprofessional. But still an improvement over rejection I think. Not for the paper, mind you. It won’t gain anything by this. But it at least has a chance to get published now.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Ah, OK, good.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.