My point is that the lack of training/professionalism/incentives is the problem, not 1-indexed arrays or whatnot. Maybe throwing everything out and starting over is the only way to fix that, but I'm not sure. Pycharm and RStudio seem to be converging on a very similar IDE, FWIW.
-
-
"They obfuscate their source code in many cases, meaning bugs are much harder to spot and impossible to edit ourselves without risking court action. Moreover, using Matlab for science results in paywalling our code."http://neuroplausible.com/matlab
-
"We are by definition making our computational science closed."http://neuroplausible.com/matlab
-
Matlab is NOT
#opensource ergo nor#openscience -
I take it you didn't click, so here is the link:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2470765/can-i-distribute-my-matlab-program-as-open-source …
-
Do not reply to me again because you're not engaging in good faith.
-
No, you can't. Matlab changes the guts of their code and often its obfuscated.https://twitter.com/prokraustinator/status/1031554859370201088?s=19 …
-
Anyway it's pointless. I'm done with you because the audience can make their mind up with what I've said. It's not my definition of
#openscience it's the only one out there. -
I'm done here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You don't need matlab to read an .m file. Anything that can read a python script will allow you to inspect .m files too. Open Science can mean many things but "released in a form that is maximally convenient for me" is not one of them. Can you see what they did? Job done.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
