I have long defended Matlab for it's simplicity to non CSy users. But maybe, just maybe, it's logical mistakes and weaknesses prevent the users' progress at coding. Legitimate worry or flamebait?https://twitter.com/NeuroFidelity/status/1031298982281138178 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @KordingLab
Also, cc'ing
@o_guest , who's written very well on this issue and has a more informed opinion.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheFrontalLobe_ @KordingLab
Thank you! My blog post is linked to under that quoted tweet, so I think I'm probably covered as everything I think is in there. I actually reread it yesterday since it's been more than a year and I still agree with myself.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Original threads I linked to might be useful for a better sample of views at I'm seeing only defence of Matlab here:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/841671820575162368 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes
But yeah, IMHO the most damning thing is: "Matlab obfuscate[s] their source code [...] meaning bugs are much harder to spot and impossible to edit ourselves without risking court action. Moreover, using Matlab for science results in paywalling our code."http://neuroplausible.com/matlab
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


I hate Matlab: How an IDE, a language, and a mentality harm