What is the most insane comment you’ve gotten in a peer review? I was told never to discuss effect size (results are either significant or not). However, @Chrismartin76 may have me beat. https://twitter.com/Chrismartin76/status/1029815128894713857 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @tcarpenter216 @Chrismartin76
From when I was a PhD student: "Try as I may, I just can't see that this article says much, if anything, of interest."
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
Oh and same reviewer: "In conclusion, I think that the contribution of this article, above and beyond the obvious, is minimal."
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Affected me for sure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m so sorry. That’s awful.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It made me question a lot of things, especially since nobody said that was bad really, my PI didn't seem to think we needed to discuss it and the Action Editor and my PI didn't think this was in any way unprofessional. Like you can decide not to send us the reviewers words...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
If I were the editor I’d have serious words with that reviewer
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Ironically, AFAIK I have met this guy 3 times, the reviewer. He doesn't remember me between times, he doesn't connect my name to the published paper, and he actually likes me every time.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
By AFAIK, I mean I am guessing who it was.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.