What is the most insane comment you’ve gotten in a peer review? I was told never to discuss effect size (results are either significant or not). However, @Chrismartin76 may have me beat. https://twitter.com/Chrismartin76/status/1029815128894713857 …
-
-
Affected me for sure.
-
I’m so sorry. That’s awful.
-
It made me question a lot of things, especially since nobody said that was bad really, my PI didn't seem to think we needed to discuss it and the Action Editor and my PI didn't think this was in any way unprofessional. Like you can decide not to send us the reviewers words...
-
If I were the editor I’d have serious words with that reviewer

-
Ironically, AFAIK I have met this guy 3 times, the reviewer. He doesn't remember me between times, he doesn't connect my name to the published paper, and he actually likes me every time.
-
By AFAIK, I mean I am guessing who it was.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Other bad ones are harder to quote because way longer and would give away ID. But I had a few that were like YOU MUST CITE ME or no dice.
-
And to be clear: their work was 100% irrelevant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s terrible!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
