I wrote 20 papers (and 1 book) by the end of my PhD, but that wasn't the expectation from anyone. Was across several labs, and some single authored. Had some supervision issues due to my lack of focus too...
-
-
If not against law, it's almost certainly against HR policy at the institution.
-
What’s the law?
-
I'm not sure but regarding HR I did a training course at that and this institution and letters are required and must be obtained and read prior to hiring somebody. Even if they are weighted with a 0, which is allowed, they must be obtained prior to a hire.
-
BTW I'm not really an appropriate role-model/example as I neither think I will make it realistically, nor do I want/need to be a PI.
-
Sure but is a measure of a phd being on track whether they will make it as a PI one day or not? Maybe it is
-
In my experience, for most people: yes. Given the reactions I get when I say I'm not interested in being a PI, I'd say mortified isn't that far off of they like me and "yeah I knew you couldn't make it" if they don't.
-
But it’s a bit outdated. Majority of phd students move out of academia
-
Yes. I feel like I need to underline that I don't agree with them, so I am. Nevertheless, I do have trouble not seeing myself as a failure anyway, but that's not relevant to outmoded views, just my own pessimistic outlook.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.