Good point. I recognize the infinite depth of (my) kids’ questions, but indeed they do not always mean to probe lower (reductive) levels. Sometimes more like ‘reasons’ or ‘purposes’ or ‘historical explanations’ or ‘rules’.
-
-
This literally just popped up in my TL.
https://twitter.com/QuantaMagazine/status/1029074105444777984?s=19 … -
Guess I just got told by Quanta. Sorry Grace! We're wrong after all.
-
So wait, you do actually disagree with Marr then?
-
No no, I was speaking in jest. I don't actually disagree with that statement really. One shouldn't use ONLY the feathers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
