Hm. It seems so far motives include:
Misogyny
Homophobia
Perhaps I can extrapolate from here.
-
-
It's what you said. You are just not very good at expressing yourself in ways which restrict your inadequacies from being highlighted.
-
Sorry you can't properly parse "fuck with".
-
Sorry you don't realise that you expressed yourself in an embarrassingly ambiguous way. And are in denial about it.
-
I feel like I'm talking to an LSA-based bot given how you semantically align with me. Are you feeling particularly disempowered?
-
I can't do anything about how you feel. That is a consequence of your own (lack of) experience of the real world, and your limited ability to be able to process interaction with those outside your bubble.
#ownyourresponse -
I think you're very easily manipulable.pic.twitter.com/re3xlKXNTJ
-
Because I consciously mirror your inelegant word patterns? It's one of the rhetorical techniques I use. Unlike you, I think carefully about what I type. You obviously don't realise when YOU are being manipulated, but thanks for noticing.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Like I said previously you just are not very convincing.https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1028268727035420672 …
-
Like I said previously, you just are not very correct, but surely you must feel embarrassed at being continually wrong? Perhaps you should stick to artificial life, as your perception of reality is so misinformed.
-
Is "not very correct" like 20% correct?
-
You're the psychologist. Work out for yourself where in the distribution you would be confident about being right. About being wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
