I'm sorry — you have to remove my name from this @jeffemmans ASAP.
It implies I endorse those views, but I disagree categorically. I think they are damaging views and based on a fundamentally flawed perspective on the world.
There's no such thing as "Bayes vs science". https://twitter.com/jeffemmans/status/1027253218244476928 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @jeffemmans
The tweet is still there I'm afraid. Hey
@jeffemmans can you read? You have been asked to remove a tag from this tweet.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
I've read the "article" (gibberish) & don't get what purported connection to Olivia it has? Is this some kind of twitter tagging spam dealio?
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
I shared it in a thread to mock it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
JFC.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @mnitabach and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Here's the original contexthttps://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1026740924397899776?s=19 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sounds like AI time cube.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Indeed... Except sadly they have a pretty strong hold on the rhetoric around AI.
-
-
Bizarre.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yeah, it's creepy. Their Bayes related writings are just fucking bonkers too.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.