1/2 That aficionados to the allure of AI do not understand ML algorithms does not mean to imply that those who build them do not! >>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/05/magical-thinking-about-machine-learning-will-not-bring-artificial-intelligence-any-closer?CMP=share_btn_tw …
-
Show this thread
-
2/2 Through history, alarmist self appointed connoisseurs have inflicted considerable harm to knowledge and science, and so have done those with hidden interested agendas. Please stop!
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @twitemp1
intriguing, that the CS technology that has (probably) created the highest research output and input in the last decade is now being labelled as “alchemy"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EAlonso20
Indeed! I suspect that these people have very specific interests in promoting a different, classical, unsuccessful approach...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1
back to KD45. Still plenty to do of course, but labelling this new, amazing, technology as “magic”, “alchemy”, etc does not help
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EAlonso20 @twitemp1
Yes! The reason this message remains is because places like Less Wrong stoke the fire of BS 24/7. With stuff like Roko's Basilisk, Bayes versus Science, etc., etc.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Bayes versus Science was new to me. EY disappoints again. Thanks for pointing it out
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Ha. Yeah.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.