Quick clarification: this "shaming" is not from bioRXiv, but from somebody who's decided they don't like this practice. As far as I can see this is simply posting final author copy of accepted manuscripts, otherwise called "green open access". This is encouraged by @PsyArXiv.
-
-
Weird blog post.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @willjharrison @tsawallis and
I use biorxiv and disagree with Jordan. He doesn't represent biorxiv in any official capacity and he went ahead and wrote this medium article because he felt like it. He and I (and others) have disagreed on a lot over the years on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @willjharrison and
"So taken together, there could be a considerable number of people using bioRxiv as a postprint server…and getting away with it." This guy really loves his drama
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @DrGBuckingham @willjharrison and
This is the same guy who wrote this BTW... The fact that number one (least worst) is a hate crime VS number 7 which is normal in most cases (to all your students to help with maintaining the lab website, good training to) is really telling. http://www.omnesres.com/stories/warning_signs …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
all=ask, to=too

Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.