.@prokraustinator @Adrian_Jacobo @andpru @neuromusic And hiring depts definitely try to figure out how & why someone is a first author.
-
-
Replying to @mnitabach @prokraustinator and
But if the paper is a 50/50 collaboration where one person did the experiments and the other did the theory and both came up with the ideas figuring out who is the "first author" is an ill defined enterprise.
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @cian_neuro @andpru and
I basically quit a paper over something along these lines but even worse, sadly. They added in another modeller/theorist without even telling us who did some other random stuff that was actually really misplaced because unlike us they were not there at the inception of the work.
0 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @waterlego @cian_neuro and
It's not even close to like that...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @waterlego and
That's pretty much what I was taught. I admit to not considering other perspectives. I guess I've got some homework to do ... (sheepishly scampers away ...)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
BTW that's really depressing people think models which are basically theories made from maths/code are (non-bayesian) evidence.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
