.@prokraustinator @Adrian_Jacobo @andpru @neuromusic Not taking a position on whether this is a good idea or not, just that it exists.
-
-
Replying to @mnitabach
.
@prokraustinator@Adrian_Jacobo@andpru@neuromusic And hiring depts definitely try to figure out how & why someone is a first author.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mnitabach @prokraustinator and
But if the paper is a 50/50 collaboration where one person did the experiments and the other did the theory and both came up with the ideas figuring out who is the "first author" is an ill defined enterprise.
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @cian_neuro @andpru and
I basically quit a paper over something along these lines but even worse, sadly. They added in another modeller/theorist without even telling us who did some other random stuff that was actually really misplaced because unlike us they were not there at the inception of the work.
0 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @waterlego @cian_neuro and
For one paper we are working on I did the modelling first, suggested a bunch of experiments and predicted their results. We did the experiments and it all worked! Some colleagues suggested that we should write the story with experiments first and the model at the end
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Adrian_Jacobo @waterlego and
Journal peer reviewers demanded that we reconfigure one of our papers exactly like that.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Ayyyy so unethical.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.