Read about an alternative timeline where I don't exist, "To learn how cognition is implemented in the brain, we must build computational models that can perform cognitive tasks, and test such models with brain and behavioral experiments" @NKriegeskorte https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.11819
-
-
Replying to @ProfData @NKriegeskorte
come on, you know it doesn’t count unless you didn’t first earn your phd from a famous neuroscientist
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @todd_gureckis @NKriegeskorte
Sick truth burn. Mirroring the larger society: Damn reality, ideas, and actual scientific contributions. The important people are important for a reason and know your place.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
"But it's a meritocracy!"
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
and then there are entire subfields that redo others (hello contextual bandit in reinforcement learning) because it didn't count the first time.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
These two sentences are painful to read: "Cognitive science has developed computational models of human cognition, decomposing task performance into computational components. However, its algorithms still fall short of human intelligence and are not grounded in neurobiology."
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
I hope they do a more truthful/well-rounded job when they talk about CogSci in the main body... They do quote Marr, but those sentences...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.