If true, which it might be, then I guess it's a problem with academic/conference culture then more broadly.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @PratherLab and
ideas: 1/blinded reviews (with rebuttals) to improve paper quality 2/major awards chosen by popular society vote not a "select" panel 3/more outreach to aligned disciplines so field isn't so cliquish for psych+dev 4/paper awards not for current year but a "test of time" award
3 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @todd_gureckis @o_guest and
Yeah, that would remove some corruption. I think more focus on what people are doing lately, as opposed to lifetime achievement awards, would help in terms of steering the field, but also in terms of diversity. Imagine if Rumelhart Award was for achievement in the last 10 years?
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @ProfData @todd_gureckis and
Something I learned from the many discussions private and non- that the women and gender minorities in comp cog sci generated is that I and others'd like to see discrimination (structural, institutional, not only individual) addressed/discussed with men included in the
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
discussions and implementation of the solutions. No fig leaf inclusivity. No more "but there are many women in developmental psychology". the leaky pipeline leaks for reasons. The stories of Amy Perfors and Eliana Colunga and myself (from the
@WomenInCogSci panel) are identical1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
for reasons.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Natalia Vélez
I want to meet more people like me, but we should not be the only ones getting through. Eliana's slide was pretty damning for the fields we move in. I wish all the men who think "but there are women in dev psy" isOK to say had been there!https://twitter.com/natvelali/status/1022243679208136704 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Are the slides available online?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tallinzen @ProfData and
Mine are (mine are just images sadly, so you will get little from them) but of course you mean Eliana's — AFAIK: no. But you should ask her, I am sure she will be honoured that you want to know what we said that day.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @tallinzen and
Dr Suzy J Styles Retweeted Dr Suzy J Styles
Also, I was live tweeting, so there's a bit of content from the talks here:https://twitter.com/suzyjstyles/status/1022238305079808000?s=21 …
Dr Suzy J Styles added,
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
Oh, poop! I totally forgot that! Thank you (both for linking here and for live tweeting)!
Also slight tangent, but so great to meet you at CogSci, swap stories on you-know-who, and generally support each other. I'm always here for you & everyone involved with him. 
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @tallinzen and
It was great to meet you too! Had great chats and
entertaining
reminiscences!
Let's home next time there's a bit more proactive work on how to make improvements (rather than just opening the topic for discussion)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @suzyjstyles @tallinzen and
I guess it starts with a chat. But yes, agreed! Less talking more actions! (Or like lots of talking and lots of actions too!)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
