Oh, haha. CogSci Soc's Twitter account unfollowed me after following me for a couple years. Laughed out loud. 
-
-
ideas: 1/blinded reviews (with rebuttals) to improve paper quality 2/major awards chosen by popular society vote not a "select" panel 3/more outreach to aligned disciplines so field isn't so cliquish for psych+dev 4/paper awards not for current year but a "test of time" award
-
Yeah, that would remove some corruption. I think more focus on what people are doing lately, as opposed to lifetime achievement awards, would help in terms of steering the field, but also in terms of diversity. Imagine if Rumelhart Award was for achievement in the last 10 years?
-
Something I learned from the many discussions private and non- that the women and gender minorities in comp cog sci generated is that I and others'd like to see discrimination (structural, institutional, not only individual) addressed/discussed with men included in the
-
discussions and implementation of the solutions. No fig leaf inclusivity. No more "but there are many women in developmental psychology". the leaky pipeline leaks for reasons. The stories of Amy Perfors and Eliana Colunga and myself (from the
@WomenInCogSci panel) are identical -
for reasons.
-
I want to meet more people like me, but we should not be the only ones getting through. Eliana's slide was pretty damning for the fields we move in. I wish all the men who think "but there are women in dev psy" isOK to say had been there!https://twitter.com/natvelali/status/1022243679208136704 …
-
Are the slides available online?
-
Mine are (mine are just images sadly, so you will get little from them) but of course you mean Eliana's — AFAIK: no. But you should ask her, I am sure she will be honoured that you want to know what we said that day.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.