Computational models? Never seen any coherent position on this. I'm not convinced pre-registration and Computational modelling are compatible per se more like parallels. @BArslan_CogSci @bradpwyble @IrisVanRooij
-
-
Ah yes, I recall that cool paper :)
-
This is another reason I get upset when people say we don't do theory in psych/neuro... like, we do, we really do.
-
We do. But surely, we need more of it. I think we need theoretical psychology to grow to match mass in experimental psychology. We are still too far removed from that IMHO.
-
Match what mass?
-
I meant, nr of people doing theoretical work vs nr of people doing experimental work. I think the ratio is off. Need not be 1, but currently perhaps more like <0.001. Or too pessimistic?
-
Perhaps I should make a poll ;)
-
It will be a touchy subject as I think many are misguided at what they even do sometimes? Maybe I'm being too rude. Anyway possible a poll will work but a literature review (so time consuming though) would probably be better?
-
Much better ofc! So little time ... Perhaps if it could be more automated. But don’t have those skills :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
